Consociational democracy and the case of switzerland. Arend dangremond lijphart born 17 august 1936, apeldoorn, netherlands is a political scientist specializing in comparative politics, elections and voting systems, democratic institutions, and ethnicity and politics. In this updated and expanded edition of his classic text, arend lijphart offers a broader and deeper analysis of worldwide democratic institutions than ever before. Lijphart starts by differentiating between majoritarian and consensus democracy by asking the question who governs and in whose interest in cases of disagreement. Of course, democracy may be ideologically more hospitable to a. Patterns of democracy government forms and performance in. Democratic theory states that poverty, widespread illiteracy, and a deeply hierarchized social structure are inhospitable conditions for a democracy to function in. Patterns of democracy government forms and performance in thirtysix countries arend lijphart yale university press new haven and london. For those readers who are familiar with democracies, let me describe the principal changes in patterns of democracy in somewhat greater detail. Lijphart argues that consensus democracy is better see below. From this perspective, i reassess the relevance of arend lijpharts prescriptions about democratizing states to constitutional engineers, by investigating his claims within the postcommunist context. A first question is whether autonomous regions can be considered as fully fledged democratic political systems similar to the state democracies lijphart considers. Examining thirtysix democracies during the period from 1945 to 2010, lijphart arrives at importantand unexpectedconclusions about what type of democracy works.
In patterns of democracy, arend lijphart 1999 not only contends that democratic institutions cluster in two distinct forms, but also that consensus democracieswhen contrasted with. Patterns of democracy government forms and performance. Types, cases, causes and consequences by arend lijphart introduction this article is an elaboration on the. Examining thirtysix democracies during the period from 1945 to 2010, lijphart arrives at importantand unexpectedconclusions about what type of democracy works best.
In democracies and patterns of democracy, he distinguishes between majoritarian and consensus democracies. Table of contents preface 1 introduction 1 2 the westminster model of democracy 9 3 the consensus model of democracy 31 4 thirtysix democracies 48 5 party systems. Patterns of democracy government forms and performance in thirtysix countries. Presents a study which investigated the claims of arend lijphart that switzerland is a case of consociational democracy. Sep 01, 2012 arend lijphart s patterns of democracy has become a standardized text within the comparative politics subfield, but i think the question needs to be asked given all the divergence in regime type that sprouted with the downfall of the soviet union, is the pure westminster system still a viable starting point for analyzing the points of. From this perspective, i reassess the relevance of arend lijpharts prescriptions about democratizing states to constitutional engineers, by investigating his claims within the. The revised edition, published in 2012, advances even stronger arguments with better data and a better methodology in support of lijpharts key message.
Logical connections and institutional design article pdf available in political studies 511. Arend lijphart is the author of patterns of democracy 3. In patterns of democracy, arend lijphart 1999 not only contends that democratic institutions cluster in two distinct forms, but also that consensus democracieswhen contrasted with majoritarian arrangementsare kinder, gentler types of institutional settings lijphart 1999. Arend lijphart s patterns of democracy has become a standardized text within the comparative politics subfield, but i think the question needs to be asked given all the divergence in regime type that sprouted with the downfall of the soviet union, is the pure westminster system still a viable starting point for analyzing the points of. Government forms and performance in thirtysix countries by lijphart, arend isbn. Government forms and performance in thirtysix countries, 2012, 368 pages, arend lijphart, 0300172028, 9780300172027, yale university.
Arend lijphart s patterns of democracy has become a standardized text within the comparative politics subfield, but i think the question needs to be asked given all the divergence in regime type that sprouted with the downfall of the soviet union, is the pure westminster system still a viable starting point for analyzing the points of democratic governance. By expanding lijpharts concept of majoritarian and consensus democracy for the most recent period 19972006, this paper examines the relationship between direct democracy and lijpharts institutional variables in 23 modern democracies. Westminster and consensus democracies differ along two dimensions, each of which has five elements. In patterns of democracy, lijphart 1999 contends that democracies cluster in two distinct forms.
The article pays tribute to professor arend lijphart, pioneer in the studies of democracy. What is more, he argues that in contrast to majoritarian arrangements, consensus democracies are kinder, gentler forms of institutional settings. Through the analysis of political systems in six continents, he demonstrates that what he calls consociational democracy can be successful in severely divided or plural societies. While some scholars argue that an electoral system with proportional representation combined with a decentralized system works best, and that the type of electoral system is crucial lijphart 1999, others state that a proportional electoral system with a centralized and hence not decentralized system lead to better performance gerring et al. Arend lijphart in this updated and expanded edition of his classic text, arend lijphart offers a broader and deeper analysis of worldwide democratic institutions than ever before. Starting from a comparison of two schools of research on nonmajoritarian democracieslijpharts approach and lehmbruchs contributions to the study consociational democracy, the commentary reports the changes in the second edition of patterns of democracy such as updated data sources and a more comprehensive and rigorous analysis of. Sure its a democracybut how is it still a democracy. Based on a factor analysis, our main finding is that there are not just two, but three dimensions of. The present article reveals that lijpharts two dimensional map of democracy, although applicable. These differences are reflected in the current functioning of democracy in india, making it difficult to fit the indian case to the canonical. The economist intelligence units democracy index provides a snapshot of the state of democracy worldwide for 165 independent states and two territories microstates are excluded. The first edition of lijpharts patterns of democracy yale university press, 1999 has been praised as a seminal contribution to the comparative study of democracies. Here, once again, arend lijphart is directing our attention to matters which will surely engage much of the attention of students of comparative politics in the next. Arend dangremond lijphart born 17 august 1936, apeldoorn, netherlands is a political.
Lijphart, patterns of democracy by roxana marin on prezi. Government forms and performance in thirtysix countries by lijphart, arend and a great selection of related books, art and collectibles available now at. Arend lijphart on sharing power in africa and the future of democracy interview. Theoretical, conceptual and methodological problems in.
Arend lijpharts patterns of democracy has become a standardized text within the comparative politics subfield, but i think the question needs to be asked given all the divergence in regime type that sprouted with the downfall of the soviet union, is the pure westminster system. I cant think of another scholar as well qualified as lijphart to write a book of this kind. Government forms and performance in thirtysix countries 2nd revised edition by lijphart, arend isbn. Arend lijphart is likely among the most quoted contemporary political. Of course, democracy may be ideologically more hospitable to a rule of law, but it is the. In this updated and expanded edition of his classic text, arend lijphart offers a. Nov 17, 2008 in patterns of democracy, arend lijphart 1999 not only contends that democratic institutions cluster in two distinct forms, but also that consensus democracieswhen contrasted with majoritarian arrangementsare kinder, gentler types of institutional settings lijphart 1999.
That it is difficult to achieve and maintain stable democratic government in a plural society is a wellestablished proposition in political sciencewith a history reaching back to aristotles adage that a state aims at being, as far as it can be, a society composed of equals and peers. Arend lijpharts typology of democratic systems has been one of the major contributions to comparative political. The second type of democracy, consensus democracy, involves far greater compromise and significant minority rights. Later, lijphart extends the notion of consociational democracy to the patterns of democratic institutions, in general. View notes lijphart from poli 212 at mcgill university. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders. Patterns of democracy government forms and performance in thirtysix countries second edition arend lijphart yale university. In this discussion paper a number of theoretical, conceptual and methodological problems in applying lijpharts patterns of democracy to regional political systems will be addressed. The bestresearched book on democracy in the world today. Patterns of democracy by arend lijphart, 9780300078930, available at book depository with free delivery worldwide. Concentration versus sharing of executive power 90 7 executivelegislative relations.
The reaction to lijpharts book, patterns of democracy 1999. If the majority are poor, and the democratic processes work, the property rights of the rich minority may always be under a threat. London wikipedia citation please see wikipedias template documentation for further citation fields that may be required. Arend lijpharts patterns of democracy has become a standardized text within the comparative politics subfield, but i think the question needs to be asked given all the divergence in regime type that sprouted with the downfall of the soviet union, is the pure westminster system still a viable starting point for analyzing the points of democratic governance. Patterns of dominance and balance of power 116 8 electoral systems. As a result, while patterns of democracy grew out of democracies, it has become an entirely new book rather than a second edition.
Consensus democracy makes a difference 275 17 conclusions and recommendations 301 appendix a. Dahl is sterling professor emeritus of political science at yale university. Government forms and performance in thirtysix countries 9780300078930. Patterns of democracy government forms and performance in thirtysix countries second.
342 346 224 514 1419 713 1420 99 201 1435 1337 1427 7 984 266 757 1216 246 1445 1125 969 1262 634 253 28 111 1434 661 233 672 521 709 936 1224 696 93 140 828 1498 436 1065 950 1206 806 95 1002